In recent years, developed countries have seen the rise of a popular literature and social media discussion concerning “the problem with work today.” Since this literature tends to reflect the frustrations of the professional-managerial class (as well as other workers in globalized services industries in the digital age), it is often at a significant distance from the concerns of the organized labor movement and the traditional Left. Much of this literature presents what amounts to an unacceptable either/or: workers are encouraged either to “lean-in,” and become better “human capitals,” or else they are being offered palliative care for these same “neoliberal selves” by means of admonitions to undertake personal projects of self-optimization, recovery, and wellness.
In Signs of the Great Refusal, Tedd Siegel challenges the assumptions supporting this set of highly constrained possibilities, asking instead about what it might take to de-privatize and re-politicize work itself under contemporary conditions, in order to make a broad-based politics of refusal potentially viable. Where post-work, anti-work, and degrowth discussions taking place today often describe and promote various “post-work imaginaries” in which the de-commodification of labor is only implied, Signs of the Great Refusal is concerned specifically with the “post-work political imaginary.” Taking up a question formulated by Peter Fleming, Siegel asks, “Can the impossibility at the heart of contemporary capitalism be politically activated to oppose and escape work-as-we-know-it?”